Topics · Domain workflow
Incident teams can check command context and safety rules after the physical event without depending on the vendor cloud console or narrative logs.
Concrete scenario
A warehouse robot enters a restricted zone. Operations claims the safety geofence was active. Maintenance later discovers a firmware patch changed limits yesterday. Investigators need signed command receipts with pre-state, post-state, safety policy bindings, and controller identity that verify offline.
Problem
Robots move in the physical world. After an incident, a log narrative is not enough. Investigators need proof of what the machine was told to do and which safety rules were active.
Mechanism
Control actions mint receipts binding command payloads, controller identity, safety policy profile, and evidence roots for sensor or scene commitments where declared. Profiles can require robotics safety envelopes so incident reviewers see explicit policy context, not inferred UI states.
Verifiable outcome
Scope boundary
Receipts document signed control actions — not mechanical failure analysis, OSHA outcomes, or safety certification without applicable standards and operator program participation.