Topics · Domain workflow

Privacy-chain settlement

Regulators verify recognition and disclosed commitments match signed receipts while confidential fields remain sealed until authorized review by parties with disclosure rights.

Concrete scenario

What this looks like in practice

A clearinghouse must demonstrate that a batch settled under agreed rules without revealing counterparty positions. Auditors need cryptographic proof of execution order and recognition — not a spreadsheet export from the operator or a verbal attestation from the risk desk.

Problem

What breaks today

Settlement and clearing systems must prove correct execution to regulators and counterparties while keeping transaction details confidential. Public proof and private payloads pull in opposite directions during audits and enforcement reviews.

Mechanism

How ZK-SNAP responds

ZK-AI separates governed anchoring from private disclosure: receipts carry commitments suitable for recognition while sensitive settlement fields stay permissioned behind profile-bound openings and sealed claims. ZKAI and GAS meter protocol settlement operations where accounting profiles apply, keeping on-log witness data limited to compact recognition facts.

Verifiable outcome

What a verifier can check

  • Settlement receipts verify offline for structure and signature.
  • Public recognition does not leak private position fields by default.
  • Metered settlement operations map to governed chain events.
  • Disclosure openings are explicit and profile-bound.

Related profiles and labels

Settlement proofPrivacy pathOptional attribution

Scope boundary

What a receipt does not replace

Privacy-chain patterns reduce exposure — not zero-knowledge guarantees unless hybrid crypto profiles are declared, implemented, and verified for that deployment.

Go deeper

Try the workflow, then read the spec.

Use Cases tells the story with cards. Proof Lab runs create and verify locally. Protocol holds the normative reference.